|
New and Age-Old Voter Suppression Tactics in 2020
Through discriminatory tactics that go back hundreds of years, white people have clung to disproportionate political power and wealth. Now, as that power is threatened by demographic shifts and backlash against the president, the effort to rule has become more brazen.
In The Center for Public Integrity’s Barriers to the Ballot Box series, the outlet collects stories of voter disenfranchisement. This latest story rounds up age-old tactics used to suppress votes in 2020, including slowing the mail, speeding up a Supreme Court appointment, not counting people of color in the census, not counting ballots, and reducing polling locations near communities of color while expanding locations in white communities.
Immense lines in Iowa and North Carolina due to sparse or closed polling places illustrate widespread and varied instances of suppression, exacerbated by the pandemic.
|
|
|
‘Drop It Off or Vote in Person,’ Advocates Plea as Supreme Court Says It Could Toss Late Ballots
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued decisions allowing Pennsylvania and North Carolina to accept absentee ballots that arrive after Election Day, until November 6. This came as relief to voters and advocates dreading mass invalidation of late ballots, but analysts warn that the possibility remains for ballots arriving after Nov 3 to be tossed by the Supreme Court later.
Common Dreams reports that ballots arriving after 8:00 p.m. on Election Day are to be segregated from ballots that arrive before then. The advice from election advocates and experts: drop off your ballot in person to avoid the mail delays caused by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy. Find local drop-off sites here.
|
|
|
Working-Class America Needs Real Change, Not Slogans
Carlos Figueroa, Associate Professor of Politics at Ithaca College, dissects the sloganism of Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential campaign at Fair Observer.
Both Biden’s battle for the “soul of America” and Trump’s “Keep America Great” operate “within a symbolic/performative political frame that supposedly addresses the real needs of the American working people.” But these slogans “perpetuate the bitter partisanship keeping us ‘trampling on each other for our scraps of bread.’”
We instead need a transformative politics to directly answer “concerns of the majority working-class people across race, ethnicity, gender, religion, and civic or legal status now and after the election.” |
|
|
War Wasn’t a Campaign Issue. What Does That Mean for the Next Presidency?
Joe Biden and Donald Trump sparred over domestic problems of racism, health care, climate change, the economy and the pandemic, and alleged foreign election interference. They did not engage in discussions of foreign policy and the threat of nuclear war, nor did the issues arise during primaries.
Meanwhile, “relations with Russia, China and Iran are the worst they’ve been in decades under the Trump administration. And nuclear war looms more menacing than since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962,” writes Truthout.
It may not have been politically advantageous to bring up nuclear war—but reducing nuclear spending “would go a long way to extending the life expectancy of our species.”
|
|
|
Another Tech Hearing in Congress Becomes a Circus Sideshow
The last Congressional hearing this summer with executives from Facebook, Google, and Twitter, following a fifteen-month-long investigation by the House Committee on Antitrust, asked meaningful questions of Big Tech.
But a separate hearing on Wednesday with Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook, Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter, and Sundar Pichai, chief executive of Google, degenerated “into grandstanding by politicians who either don’t understand the issues, or were happy to pretend in order to get video clips of themselves grilling a trio of billionaires.”
Columbia Journalism Review notes the incompetence and ill timing at play of the hearing and its topics, including Twitter’s alleged censorship of Donald Trump’s tweets. |
|
Glenn Greenwald with the tweet of the week: |
|
|
The US Exits the Paris Climate Accord the Day After the Election
Regardless of the presidential election’s outcome, the United State will officially leave the 2015 Paris climate agreement on Nov. 4. Without the promise of the world’s biggest historic greenhouse gas polluter to slash emissions, “there’s little hope of meeting the Paris target of averting catastrophic global warming.”
InsideClimate News reports the U.S. could rejoin the pact just 30 days after sending a letter to the United Nations Secretary General, alongside a new national emissions reduction pledge. Joe Biden has said he’d do so early in his presidency.
The Paris agreement aims to limit global warming to under 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and as close to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit as possible, by reducing greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050. The U.S. was set to exit the agreement one year from when the Trump administration submitted its withdrawal notice, on Nov. 4, 2019. |
|
|
In Other News
1. Greece-Turkey earthquake – latest: 14 killed as 7.0-magnitude tremor destroys buildings (The Independent)
2. The Pandemic Is in Uncharted Territory (The Atlantic)
3. More People Have Now Voted Early In Texas Than In All Of 2016 (HuffPost)
4. Breonna Taylor: Police officer sues shot black woman’s boyfriend (BBC)
5. Your absentee ballot never showed up. Now what? (The Guardian)
|
|
|